Study suggests differences in nutritional value for vitamin D types

19 Jul 2017

A study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition has indicated that vitamin D2 and D3 do not have the same nutritional value.

Researchers from the University of Surrey examined the vitamin D levels of 335 South Asian and white European women aged between 20 and 64 years over two consecutive winter periods. 

The women were split into five groups and randomly assigned to either receive a placebo, a juice containing 15g of vitamin D2 or D3, or a biscuit containing 15g of vitamin D2 or D3 daily for 12 weeks. 

The results showed that vitamin D levels in women who received vitamin D3 via juice increased by 75%, while vitamin D levels in those who ate the biscuit increased by 74%. Those given D2 saw an increase of 33% and 34%, respectively. 

Lead author of the study, Dr Laura Tripkovic from the University of Surrey, said, “Our findings show that vitamin D3 is twice as effective as D2 in raising vitamin D levels in the body, which turns current thinking about the two types of vitamin D on its head.” 

Professor Susan Lanham-New, head of the Department of Nutritional Sciences at the University of Surrey and principal investigator, said, “This is a very exciting discovery, which will revolutionise how the health and retail sector views vitamin D. Vitamin D deficiency is a serious matter, but this will help people make a more informed choice about what they can eat or drink to raise their levels through their diet.”


Log-in to post a comment