Mr Apostolos Vlachogiorgos argues why all practitioners should use single-use sterile markers in their practice
We’re all aware that every aesthetic procedure carries a risk of complications. In recent years, concerns have arisen that inadequate regulation, coupled with the growing accessibility of dermal fillers and increased patient exposure, has contributed to a rise in complication rates.1
In 2024, members of the British College of Aesthetic Medicine (BCAM) reported experiencing 1,913 complications from their own procedures over the previous 12 months. In addition, they treated 3,547 complications caused by procedures performed by other practitioners.2
In reality, it is widely believed that underreporting means the actual number of complications is significantly higher.1,3 Yet, despite the ever-increasing number of reported issues, many practitioners continue to overlook a simple but critical element of infection control – the sterility of clinical tools.
Understanding risks of infection
Research further indicates that inadequate infection control is giving rise to the development of injectable complications, with the Aesthetics Complications Expert (ACE) Group World highlighting…
